Technical readiness:
This technique is not yet ready for commercial use. Further data—particularly regarding spray drift—are required before approval. However, it is currently the subject of active research and development.Ease and efficiency of implementation:
At present, drone spraying cannot be considered easy to implement due to its unavailability on the market. However, once approved, implementation is expected to be relatively straightforward, particularly via service providers. Drone technology has advanced rapidly in recent years, and technical expertise is increasingly available.Need for training and education:
Operators will require a high level of education and training, likely with stricter requirements than those for conventional spraying equipment.Need for investment:
Investment costs are expected to be moderate if the service is provided by third-party contractors or entrepreneurs, minimizing the need for individual farmers to purchase equipment.
Description
This solution involves the use of drones for site-specific herbicide application. Drones can be programmed to perform precise spraying operations, targeting only areas where weed pressure exists, rather than broadcasting chemicals across the entire field.
Country
IWM Pillar
IWM Tactic
Crop
Explanation
Drone spraying has strong potential to significantly reduce herbicide use, particularly through targeted patch spraying after cereal harvests. This approach minimizes chemical input, improves efficiency, and supports sustainable agricultural practices by reducing environmental impact.
Advantages
Can be highly efficient for patch spraying after harvest. Offers benefits such as the ability to spray in wet conditions and in small or uneven fields.
No significant socio-economic effects identified.
Operational model not yet clear; spraying is likely to be performed by external contractors.
Reduces overall herbicide use, supporting environmentally sustainable practices.
Drawbacks
Spray drift has not been sufficiently studied. Regulatory frameworks are not yet established, and commercial drone spraying is currently not permitted.
No significant socio-economic drawbacks identified.
If carried out by contractors, the timing of spraying may not align with optimal conditions.
Potential for spray drift remains uncertain; further environmental assessment is needed, and regulatory bodies are monitoring closely.
Technical Aspects
Policy Recommendations
Demonstration activities and field trials are essential to thoroughly evaluate spray drift and ensure safe implementation. Broader policy recommendations should be deferred until the technology is approved for commercial use and more data become available.
CBA Availability
false
Environmental Analysis Color
green