Camera or GPS guided mechanical weeding

By Penny, 14 May, 2025
Description
This method involves using hoes to control weeds growing between crop rows. When combined with camera systems, the precision of the operation increases significantly.
Country
IWM Pillar
IWM Tactic
Explanation
Inter-row hoeing is already a widely used and effective method for weed control in arable crops. It provides a reliable, herbicide-free alternative, contributing to more sustainable and environmentally friendly farming practices.
Advantages
• Performs well under the right conditions and is supported by well-established technology.
• No significant socio-economic barriers identified.
• Requires only limited training compared to other field operations, making it relatively accessible.
• Entirely avoids herbicide use, offering an environmentally friendly approach to weed control.
Drawbacks
• Effectiveness depends on field conditions—performance may be limited in wet conditions, stony or heavy soils, and with persistent root weeds.
• No major socio-economic drawbacks identified.
• Determining the optimal timing and integration with other weed control methods requires training and experience.
• If overused, the technique may lead to a reduction in soil organic matter, impacting long-term soil health.
Technical Aspects

Technical readiness
The technique is well-established and readily available on the market.

Ease and efficiency of implementation
Relatively easy to adopt, though overall efficiency depends on several factors such as soil conditions, machine settings, and field timing.

Need for training and education
High—efficiency is strongly influenced by how and when the technique is applied. More demanding in challenging conditions, such as wet or clay-heavy soils. Operators must adjust speed and timing carefully to match field conditions.

Need for investments
The initial investment is relatively high, with typical costs starting around €100,000.

CBA Availability
false
Social Analysis Color
green
Environmental Analysis Color
green