Electrical weeding in arable systems

By Penny, 9 May, 2025
Description
Electrical weeding involves an electrical current being passed through a weed when in contact with an electrode turning into heat energy within the plant. This results in the cells in the roots and foliage bursting, causing death or suppressing growth.
Country
IWM Pillar
IWM Tactic
Explanation
Electrical weeding offers a sustainable alternative to chemical herbicides. The technique offers potential to reduce herbicide usage and their potential effects on the environment. Control is non-selective, affecting all plants to come in to contact with the electrodes. Shielded applicators could allow for development of in-row machines. Development of electrical weed wipers and the use of AI and robotics could offer site specific spot applications.
Advantages
Can reduce the need for manual labor associated with hand weeding.

Requires a skilled operator, potentially supporting specialized employment.
Utilizes specialist equipment for targeted weed control.
Pesticide-free method, contributing to reduced chemical input and environmental impact.
Drawbacks
Slower than chemical spraying.
• High fuel consumption.

Equipment costs are high, which may limit accessibility for smaller farms.

• Slower operation compared to conventional methods.
• Fire risk must be managed, depending on the technology used (e.g. flame weeding).
Technical Aspects

Technical readiness
Currently, no commercial equipment is available in the UK—or globally—for use in arable systems. RootWave (a UK-based electrical weeding company) has partnered with Garford (a machinery manufacturer) to develop an inter-row electrical weeder for cereals. However, this system is primarily designed for perennial cropping systems such as orchards and vineyards.

Ease and efficiency of implementation
The method requires a skilled and trained operator. While it has not yet been tested in UK arable systems, electrical weeding has demonstrated high efficacy in perennial crops like fruit orchards and vineyards. Therefore, similar weed control performance is expected, though there are concerns regarding crop safety in cereals.

Need for training and education
Training will be essential to ensure safe and effective implementation. Wider education is also needed to raise awareness and support adoption of the method across farming systems.

Need for investments
The equipment is expected to be costly, which may limit accessibility. However, it is particularly well-suited to organic farms, where non-chemical weed control is essential.

Policy Recommendations
To support adoption, grant funding for equipment purchases should be made available. Subsidies or incentives could be integrated into sustainable farming support schemes to promote uptake. Additionally, investment in training and education will be crucial to ensure safe, effective, and widespread use of electrical weeding technology in arable systems.
CBA Availability
false
Social Analysis Color
green
Environmental Analysis Color
green