Year
2019
IWM Tactic
DOI
10.3390/agronomy9090564
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85072600923&doi=10.3390%2fagronomy9090564&partnerID=40&md5=4cdc85b3205e4f0d718d4142482024ec
Country
Crop
Description of Tested Tactic
Beside an untreated control, three herbicide strategies were tested: A pre-emergence autumn treatment with 3.0 L prosulfocarb (800 g L−1), applied within seven days after winter wheat sowing; a post-emergence spring treatment with 0.9 L mesosulfuron-methyl (10 g L−1) + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium (2 g L−1) + non-ionic surfactant, applied at the beginning of the growing period (from mid- to late April); a combination of these autumn and spring treatments.
with stale seedbed; without stale seedbed
increasing winter wheat seed rate from 300 to 400 seeds m−2
Description of Reference System
untreated control
without stale seedbed
Interactions were found between seed rate and herbicide strategy and between sowing strategy and herbicide strategy. Averaged over the levels of sowing strategy, the high winter wheat seed rate caused a slight reduction in the efficacy of the autumn herbicide treatment, whereas the spring herbicide treatment was not affected by the winter wheat seed rate
Reference System Type
NO-HERBICIDE
HERBICIDE-BASED
IWM Pillar
Availability