Benefits of precision farming technologies for mechanical weed control in soybean and sugar beet - Comparison of precision hoeing with conventional mechanical weed control

By rest-user, 18 October, 2023
Authors
Kunz C., Weber J.F., Gerhards R.
Year
2015
IWM Tactic
Mechanical weeding
SENSING TECHNOLOGY
DOI
10.3390/agronomy5020130
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84958967613&doi=10.3390%2fagronomy5020130&partnerID=40&md5=b3755bf0bdb3a46061eb3820ecd476ef
Country
Germany
Crop
ARABLE CROPS
Description of Tested Tactic
Herbicide; RTK inter-row cultivation (different working speeds, different working depths); RTK inter-row cultivation (different working speeds) + finger weeder; Inter-row cultivation camera guided (different working speed); Conventional inter-row cultivation; Pre-emergence flex tine harroe and conventional inter-row cultivation; Pre-emergence flex tine harrow and herbicide; Conevntional inter-row cultivation with cutting blade; Pre and Post emergence flex tine harrow + conventional inter-row cultivation; Post emergnece flex tine harrow 3 times.
Camera-driven hoe applied on soybean and sugarbeet
Description of Reference System
Hand weeding (weed free); No weed control (weedy)
Conventional hoe
Reference System Type
UNTREATED
NO-HERBICIDE
IWM Pillar
Monitoring and evaluation
Availability
Free