Year
2014
DOI
10.5586/aa.2014.007
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84959358153&doi=10.5586%2faa.2014.007&partnerID=40&md5=cfbad6212bab4dcb14ed0d2fd68d9a8d
Country
Crop
Description of Tested Tactic
1th factor Different cover crop (used as green manure): White mustard, Lacy Phacelia, Legume mix (narro-leaf lupin+field pea), 2nd Factor: Mechanical weed control (flex tine harrow post-emergence), Mechanical and chemical weed control (flex tine harrow + herbicide post-emergence), Chemical (herbicide post-emergence)
Cover crops, mechanical and chemical weed management
Type of stubble crop (Factor 1): conventional tillage without cover crop (several practices has been adopted); cover crop 1; cover crop 2; cover crop 3. Method of weed contorl (Factor 2): mechanical weed control; mechanical and chemical weed control; chemical weed control.
The aim of this 3-year field study was to evaluate the effect of some stubble crops and weed control methods on the species composition, number and air-dry weight of weeds in a spring barley crop grown in short-term monoculture. It included stubble crops which were ploughed under in each year (control treatment without cover crop, white mustard, lacy phacelia, a mixture of legumes - narrow-leaf lupin + field pea) and 3 weed control methods used in spring barley crops (mechanical, mechanical and chemical, chemical weed control).
Description of Reference System
No cover crop. Mechanical weed control (flex tine harrow post-emergence), Mechanical and chemical weed control (flex tine harrow + herbicide post-emergence), Chemical (herbicide post-emergence)
Arable fields management
Factor 1: conventional tillage without cover crop (several practices has been adopted). Factor 2: chemical weed control
Control treatment without cover crop
Reference System Type
HERBICIDE-BASED
DON'T KNOW
UNTREATED
IWM Pillar
Availability