Year
2016
IWM Tactic
DOI
10.3906/tar-1502-87
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84957089129&doi=10.3906%2ftar-1502-87&partnerID=40&md5=91a84800d8970c853cdaf5a6495d763b
Country
Crop
Description of Tested Tactic
NT, with weed control by mowing and green mulching effect. the cover was ensured in winter by wild flora, whereas in late spring weeds were controlled mechanically and the plant mass was left on the same plots and used as mulch
No-till (NT), with weed control by preemergence herbicides/foliar herbicides/mowing or Tillage with sowing and field bean (Vicia faba L. var. minor Beck) green manuring
Conventional tillage
The objective of the current research was to test the effects of five different management techniques applied for 35 years on a rain-fed almond grove (Prunus amygdalus Batsch) in a hot-dry environment on some physicochemical, hydrological, and biological parameters. The following soil management techniques were compared: no-till (NT), with weed control by preemergence herbicides; NT, with chemical weed control by foliar herbicides; NT, with weed control by mowing; tillage, with sowing and field bean green manuring; and conventional tillage.
Description of Reference System
A randomized block experimental design with 5 replicates was adopted in the field, with 147 m2 elementary plots of 3 almond plants (cultivar Filippo Ceo) of the same age (with 7 × 7 m spacing). A randomized block experimental design with 5 replicates was adopted in the field, with 147 m2 elementary plots of 3 almond plants (cultivar Filippo Ceo) of the same
age (with 7 × 7 m spacing)
age (with 7 × 7 m spacing)
Conventional tillage
Control treatment without cover crop
Reference System Type
NO-HERBICIDE
DON'T KNOW
UNTREATED
IWM Pillar
Availability